I am reposting my story because Binance removes it every time I publish it. I will not stop or give up until my case is exposed on a much larger scale..... I lost 12.93 ETH after Binance closed the dispute before Turkish police contacted them — despite a

Binance ID: 18023508 Case ID: 2262356179 Order No: 22805267579357126656 Hello everyone, I’m posting this version to clearly clarify my case and avoid any confusion. I have been an lively Binance consumer and P2P dealer for round 5 years. I absolutely understand how Binance P2P works, and I followed all platform rules on this transaction. This isn't just a simple P2P rip-off. It is a combination of seller misconduct, law-enforcement negligence, and a essential determination by Binance, which collectively brought on me to lose 12.93 ETH (≈ €40,000). What precisely happened (clear and accurate timeline)

The P2P order The vendor opened a P2P order with me to sell me ETH. I used to be the customer. Inside the Binance order chat, the vendor explicitly informed me that his checking account was blocked and asked me to send the cost by way of Payeer as an alternative. The vendor offered his Payeer account details instantly within the Binance chat field. I sent the fiat cost by way of Payeer, exactly to the account details offered by the seller contained in the Binance order chat. I uploaded full proof of cost instantly. After cost, the vendor was presupposed to release the ETH to me.

Vendor’s claim After I despatched the money, the seller claimed that: His account was “hacked”, and The funds went to a 3rd social gathering. This is not my fault or duty. I despatched the cost to the precise Payeer account that the seller himself offered inside Binance. If a vendor’s account or cost technique is compromised, that danger belongs to the seller, not the customer.

Instant legal motion in Turkey I immediately filed an official cybercrime grievance in Turkey. My case was registered with the Ankara Cyber Crimes Prosecutor’s Workplace. The prosecutor issued a written and signed official order instructing Turkish cyber police to: Contact Binance by way of the official law-enforcement channel Request momentary freezing of the disputed crypto Coordinate with Binance in the course of the investigation

Police negligence I personally visited the cyber police workplace 4 occasions. Each time I used to be informed: “The accountable officer is on depart” “Come back later” “We'll deal with it” On my last go to, an officer raised his voice and removed me from the room. End result: Turkish cyber police never contacted Binance, regardless of the prosecutor’s written order.

Binance’s important choice While Turkish police have been still inactive, Binance closed the dispute. Binance did this before Turkish authorities had a real probability to contact them, although: Binance was informed that a prosecutor’s order already existed Binance knew an official investigation was lively At that stage, Binance might have stored the belongings frozen, however chose to not.

Overseas law-enforcement involvement Later, Vietnamese regulation enforcement contacted Binance and supported the seller’s declare. Binance confirmed to me that: They acquired official communication from Vietnam They acquired nothing from Turkey, even after greater than 60 days

Remaining end result Binance said they need to comply with the authority that officially contacted them. Binance: Closed the attraction Released 12.93 ETH back to the seller The seller withdrew the ETH. My funds have been completely misplaced. Key points that have to be clear I paid appropriately and on time, utilizing the cost technique requested by the vendor himself. A hacked seller account shouldn't be my duty. Platform rules don't permit shifting vendor danger to the customer. Binance shares duty by closing the dispute and releasing the funds earlier than Turkish authorities had a fair probability to behave, regardless of understanding a authorized order existed. This can be a systemic failure. A centralized change shouldn't finalize disputes whereas a authorized investigation is ongoing. Why I'm making this public To warn others about cross-border P2P risks To point out how Binance P2P dispute safety can fail To carry both authorities and Binance accountable To push for reopening the case or a broader investigation I've all paperwork, screenshots, timestamps, Payeer transfer proofs, and official courtroom papers proving every step. If anyone may also help me convey this case to television, newspapers, or investigative journalists, or assist amplify it publicly, I might be deeply grateful. My hope is that public attention will result in a correct investigation and the recovery of my funds. No one ought to lose their life financial savings because establishments failed at a number of levels.

Last Observe: I brazenly acknowledge one mistake: I sent the cost to the Payeer account offered by the seller inside the Binance order chat, as an alternative of the account proven on his profile. Nevertheless, I need to be utterly clear and trustworthy — I have completed tons of of P2P trades before, and in lots of them, funds have been made to the account particulars shared instantly by the counterparty in the order chat, with none concern or dispute. This follow was widespread and never previously treated as fraud or misconduct. A single operational mistake does not justify dropping my whole life financial savings, nor does it remove my proper to a good and complete investigation. Binance made a critical error by closing the dispute and releasing the funds before the law-enforcement investigation was concluded, despite figuring out that an official prosecutor’s order already existed. I'm not asking for sympathy with out information — I'm asking for accountability, due process, and a correct investigation based mostly on proof, not assumptions.

Thanks for studying.